Count as Transcoded
This operation counts how much text will result from a transcode operation. Essentially, we run the encoding algorithm loop, but instead of giving the end user the re-encoded values, we instead simply provide the count for running that bulk operation.
Thusly, we use the algorithm as below to do the work. Given an input of code_units with an encoding, an initial count set at 0, and any necessary additional state, we can generically predict how many code units will result from a decoding operation by running the following loop:
⏩ Is the
inputvalue empty? If so, is thestatefinished and have nothing to output? If both are true, return the current results with the the emptyinput, currentcount, andstate, everything is okay ✅!⏩ Otherwise,
Set up an
intermediatestorage location ofcode_points (of the input encoding), using themax_code_pointsof the input encoding; and, set up anintermediate_outputstorage location ofcode_units (of the output encoding), for the next operations.Do the
decode_onestep frominput(using itsbegin()andend()) into theintermediatecode_pointstorage location, saving the returnedintermediate_outputfrom thedecode_onecall.🛑 If it failed, return with the current
input(unmodified from before this iteration, if possible), currentcount, andstates.
Do the
encode_onestep fromintermediate(using itsbegin()andend()) into theintermediate_outputcode_unitstorage location, saving the returnedintermediate_outputfrom theencode_onecall.🛑 If it failed, return with the current
input(unmodified from before this iteration, if possible), currentcount, andstates.
Compute the difference between the
begin(intermediate_output)from the original step, and thebegin(result.output)returned byencode_one; add that difference to the currentcount.
⏩ Update
input‘sbegin()value to point to after what was read by theencode_onestep.⤴️ Go back to the start.
This involves a single encoding type, and so does not need any cooperation to count the code_points. Note that this algorithm doesn’t show what the error handler does; if the error handler “erases” the failure by setting the result type’s .error_code == ztd::text::encoding_error::ok, then the algorithm will keep going. This is useful to, for example, detect the maximum size of an operation even if it errors and would result in replacement characters being inserted (e.g., from ztd::text::replacement_handler_t).
Check out the API documentation for ztd::text::count_as_transcoded to learn more.